Cost and Value of Education for Beekeepers

Thursday, 12 November 2026

All beekeepers are encouraged to participate in education but as beekeepers advance in their career, more advanced training is recommended.  Commercial beekeepers and serious hobbyists require credible information, and the cost of this information is a legitimate business expense.  The most successful beekeepers participate in training events which are provided by industry, government and sector specialists. Measuring the direct value of education and training is difficult but let us have a look broadly at its impact on beekeepers and the industry.

Cost and Value of Education for Beekeepers

A recent report, commissioned by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, presented an overview and an assessment of Canada’s agri-environmental extension services1. As agricultural extension is the foundation of professional training for farmers and producers, it is an indication of opportunities for the progression of the industry. This unique report concluded there are pockets of best practice in agricultural extension services, Quebec as the example, but some provinces and regions left room for improvement.  The Atlantic region demonstrated limited good practices, Perennia provided as one positive example, but overall could benefit from stronger collaborations across the region.  The conclusion of this report is that agricultural extension needs secure long-term funding.  This report demonstrated a relationship between funding, to ensure agricultural extension is available to farmers, and sector growth and productivity.  This conclusion is supported by other research, which theorizes that every dollar spent on agriculture / extension will return average 65% (ROI).  Extending this conceptually to an operational level, beekeepers should expect measurable returns within their own operations on investment in education and training.

One instrument to measure the return on investment for beekeepers is winter losses.  A pan European study demonstrated that newer beekeepers (less than 5 years of experience) who received no formal training, and were not part of a beekeeping organization, had significantly higher winter loss (nearly double) compared to beekeepers who did receive training, had greater than 5 years of experience, and were part of a beekeeping organization3. Furthermore, the group who received no formal training had frequent occurrences of heavy Varroa mite infestations.  This work supports the recommendation for beekeepers to engage with ongoing training, participating with provincial associations and establishing a relationship with a mentor.

Students participating in a Varroa mite management workshop (ATTTA©2026)

Closer to home in 2025, the ATTTA team and Dalhousie Extended Learning conducted an impact survey involving past students of the Modern Beekeeper (2012 – 2019) and the Fundamentals of Beekeeping (2020 – 2026) to assess the impact this training has had on the Atlantic beekeeping industry. To start, those who completed the survey, 28% of past students had continued beekeeping for greater than 10 years, 13% have made beekeeping a full-time occupation, and 80% have increased their hive numbers since taking training. Some past students report managing over 400 colonies indicating the impact training has had on their success as a commercial operation.  Additionally, a significant proportion of these beekeepers have been involved within the beekeeping industry outside of their operation. As indicated by the survey results, 76% of past students are a member of their provincial beekeeping association, 46% are a beekeeping mentor, and multiple past students have been involved with regional, provincial and national boards, committees and governance within the beekeeping industry (i.e. executive members of provincial beekeeping associations, provincial bee inspectors, regulatory roles within departments of agriculture, and members of the Canadian Association of Professional Apiarists and the Canadian Honey Council).  These are indicative of activities of successful beekeeping and making a positive contribution to the industry.

A beekeeper’s training is never complete. Not only should more experienced beekeepers take advanced courses offered within their region, but there is also value in them attending basic training and education sessions to learn how best management practices are adapting to climate change and remaining contemporary with the increased challenges of managing various pests and diseases. Beekeeping is a complex and continually evolving practice, and no beekeeper will ever be finished with their training.

There are numerous events planned for the fall and winter. Making the effort to attend will pay dividends for you as a successful beekeeper.

1.   1.   Audet, K., 2025. Assessment of agri-environmental extension services in Canada for agriculture and agrifood Canada. Canadian Agri-food & Rural Advisory, Extension and Education Journal, 1(1).

2.   2.   Alston, J.M., Andersen, M.A., James, J.S. and Pardey, P.G., 2011. The economic returns to US public agricultural research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(5), pp.1257-1277.

3.   3.   Jacques, A., Laurent, M., Epilobee Consortium, Ribière-Chabert, M., Saussac, M., Bougeard, S., Budge, G.E., Hendrikx, P. and Chauzat, M.P., 2017. A pan-European epidemiological study reveals honey bee colony survival depends on beekeeper education and disease control. PLoS one, 12(3), p.e0172591.

Connect with ATTTA Specialists

If you’d like to connect with ATTTA specialists or learn more about our program, you can:

visit our website at: https://www.perennia.ca/portfolio-items/honey-bees/

Email: attta@perennia.ca


Precision Apiculture

Thursday, 5 November 2026

Precision apiculture (PA) or precision beekeeping is a technology and data driven approach to managing honey bees.  Any experienced beekeeper will express there are no shortcuts when looking after honey bees but emerging technologies may offer increased efficiencies to modernize management practices.  This week’s blog will give an overview of some existing technologies and a window into the possible future of beekeeping.

Precision Apiculture

Reports in the media, and online, suggest that technologies, like artificial intelligence (AI), are invading every aspect of business and personal lives. How AI could reshape the overall workplace may be an important topic generally but how technological advancements could change beekeeping is worth discussing on this platform.  Beekeeping practitioners are cautious to embrace new technologies.  The barriers to implementation may be economic, as new technologies are expensive, and the practical applications need clear demonstration.  For these reasons there has not been widespread adoption of emerging technology but there are a few enthusiastic early adopters.

Smart sensors and data collection can measure a range of hive parameters.  Hive scales have long been used for measuring hive weights.  This is a useful metric to monitor changes in foraging activity, hive populations and honey production.  The numbers can support decisions on feeding and winter preparation.  This could be one of the most basic and useful application of technology to support decision making.

Figure 1 Hivetronics® mobile hive weighting tool with smart phone data display.

Temperature and humidity are a reflection of colony activity and hive environment.  There are probes available for monitoring both of these factors.  This provides beekeepers insight into colony population, queen performance, swarm activities and winter clustering.  The data alone will need interpretation by the beekeepers or more complex systems to interpret the meaning of the data.

Other sensors are available to measure CO2 and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the hive. Assessing CO2 may indicate changes in colony populations, winter clustering and ventilation.  The VOC may indicate certain chemicals that are present or entering the hive.  Those produced in the hive may show changes in honey bee health and pathogen presence.  They can also detect other substances, such as pollutants or agrochemicals to which the colony is exposed 1.  VOC may even be useful in identifying queen status in the hive 2.

The movement of bees in and out of a colony indicate the colony population and the pollination / foraging activity from that hive.  There are different sensors that can be applied to a beehive to measure the activity of the colony.  Technologies available to measure honey bee activity include Doppler radar, videography, acoustics and accelerometry 3. 

Packaging the sensor technologies into systems has been done by a range of companies.  These products can display the outputs on a dashboard as show in the figure.  The data from sensors are recorded but also can be transmitted in real time.  This is an important consideration in the use of this technology.  Recording of data is sufficient for future interpretation and analysis.  If immediate decision making and intervention is needed, then having data transmitted is important. 




Figure 2 Example of dashboard display of hive monitoring technologies.  Left to right, From the 3Bee® APP (https://www.3bee.com/en/), Colmenio® (https://www.colmenio.com/en).


The incorporation of these technologies into beekeeping practices may be the first step towards using AI and robotics to replace beekeepers.  It is unlikely that apiculture jobs will be lost to new technologies in the immediate future, but it is interesting to get an indication of where advancements may take the industry.  There are claims made by some companies that AI and robotics can replace some beekeeping activities.  Time will demonstrate the proof of this concept and it seems very futuristic.  First steps, there are opportunities for beekeepers to incorporate advancing technologies into their honey bee management.  The practicalities and economics must make sense, and the validation of these tools will come with use.  The aim of PA is to increase efficiencies, improve honey bee health, minimize resource allocation.  Incorporating sensing technologies into every hives is currently unrealistic but sampling representative hives using these tools could be immediately useful. Pragmatism is a trait found with most beekeepers and when it makes sense to use these technologies, they will be included into our beekeeping toolbox. 

1.  1.    Ilić, D., Brkić, B. and Sekulić, M.T., 2024. Biomonitoring: Developing a beehive air volatiles profile as an indicator              of environmental contamination using a sustainable in-field technique. Sustainability, 16(5), p.1713.

2.  2.    Fleay, B., 2019. Smells Like Queen Spirit: Identifying queen presence in a honey bee hive through volatile                         organic compounds (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Australia).

3.   3.   Bencsik, M., Le Conte, Y., Reyes, M., Pioz, M., Whittaker, D., Crauser, D., Simon Delso, N. and Newton, M.I.,                     2015. Honeybee colony vibrational measurements to highlight the brood cycle. PloS one, 10(11),                             p.e0141926.

Connecting with ATTTA Specialists

If you’d like to connect with ATTTA specialists or learn more about our program, you can:

visit our website at: https://www.perennia.ca/portfolio-items/honey-bees/

Email: attta@perennia.ca